![]() I'm having trouble getting the G11/SCT combo to work shooting to the East, for some reason. So, I decided to "make lemonade" and shoot to the West instead. This neatly avoids the rising 3rd-quarter moon (which was irritatingly high in the sky in Taurus tonight), and also gives me a chance to compare Veronica's efforts with those of the new telescope (need to come up with a name at some point...). So here's a 1-hour integration (30x2min) with the f/10 scope. The image is noticeably magnified, which is nice. The stars have lost their diffraction spikes, of course. And it seems like the f/10 scope isn't going to be the burden on my photography that I worried about (in theory, exposures need to be 4x longer at f/10 than at f/5). Probably worth another shot or two, just to see if I can pull out some more detail. |
![]() I tried a longer integration time on M27 (2 hours' worth of 3-minute images vs. an hour of 2 min) ...I think that I've reached the limit of what I can achieve with these skies and equipment, since this photo isn't *that* much better than the 1-hour integration. hmm. |
![]() Another attempt. I'm getting the idea that longer integration times lead to better detail and noise reduction... |
![]() M27, The Dumbbell Nebula, Planetary Nebula in Vulpecula 30 seconds has a lot of detail, but 2 minutes grabs even more... |
![]() M27, The Dumbbell Nebula, Planetary Nebula in Vulpecula This is a stack of the following 2 images of M27. The 5 minute image had nice blue nebulosity, and the 30sec images had some highly textured red, so I decided to see what they'd look like together. |
![]() M27, The Dumbbell Nebula, Planetary Nebula in Vulpecula This is the first shot after I performed the UV/IR filter removal on the D70. Note that these images are 30 *seconds* long, 10 times shorter exposure than the image taken two weeks ago with the same setup (but an unmodified camera). Big difference. |
![]() M27, The Dumbbell Nebula, Planetary Nebula in Vulpecula |